Christensen v. Galliway
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Kent Christensen, et al., No. CV-23-08509-PCT-KML 10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v. 12 Leann Renee Galliway, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Non-party attorney Robert Custis represented Mark Christensen in matters relating 16 to the trust or trusts at issue in the present case. Plaintiffs Kent Christensen and Kara 17 Christensen served Custis with a notice of deposition as well as a subpoena duces tecum. 18 Custis filed a motion to quash and memorandum in support arguing the information 19 plaintiffs seek is protected…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. OsbornCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Bank of America, N.A. v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016