Legal Opinion

Bank of America, N.A. v. Commissioner of Revenue

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided July 11, 2016No. SJC 11995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBotsford, J.

In this case, we consider whether Bank of America, N.A. (bank), in its capacity as a corporate trustee of several inter vivos trusts, qualifies as an “inhabitant” and accordingly is subject to the fiduciaiy income tax under G. L. c. 62, § 10, even though the bank is not domiciled in Massachusetts. Considering the bank’s appeal from a decision of the Appellate Tax Board (board) in which the board determined that the bank did qualify as an inhabitant, we affirm the board’s decision on the record of this case, but on somewhat different grounds. 2

1. Background 3 The bank is a national banking…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. New Bedford Gas & Edison Light Co. v. Board of AssessorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  2. Boston Professional Hockey Ass'n v. Commissioner of RevenueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Mullica West, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Attorney General v. Commissioner of InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. Commissioner of Revenue v. Wells Yachts South, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Christensen v. GalliwayDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
  2. Harlow v. Bd. of Assessors of KingstonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API