Legal Opinion

Morrow v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1957No. 8 Div. 929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

The petition was not received by the clerk of this court until the 16th day after the Court of Appeals had denied application. The Attorney General filed motion to dismiss the petition because it was filed too late. The motion is well taken.

Supreme Court Rule 39, Revised Rules of Practice, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix, provides in part that “the application [for Writ of Certiorari] to this court must be filed zvith the clerk of this court within fifteen days after the action of said court of appeals upon the said application for rehearing”.

The Court of Appeals denied the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re State ex rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Morgan Plan Co. v. BeverlySupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Ullman Bros. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thompson v. State ex rel. BordersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Tipton v. TiptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Tipton v. TiptonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API