Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Mobile Light R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 31, 1917No. 1 Div. 981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Certified Questions to Court of Appeals. Suit between, the Mobile Light & Railroad Company and one Copeland and others. On application of the company for writ of certiorari.

1Opinion of the CourtSayre, J.

[1, 2] This application having been submitted to the whole court, it is adjudged and ordered that the petition be dismissed for the reason that it was not filed within 15 days of the overruling of petitioner’s application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals as required by rule 42 (175 Ala. xx). The court is of opinion that the act of September 15, 1915 (Acts, p. 606), has no effect upon the operation of the rule.

‘The writer, considering beforehand' and doubting the propriety of .the decision thus established (for which reason he brought the case to a conference of all the judges), had…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Morrow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Ex Parte Ewart-Brewer Motor Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Thompson v. State ex rel. BordersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API