Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Grim v. Betz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1988No. 01201-01203, and 01211Published

1ConcurrenceBeck, Judge

The majority finds that an order denying the appellant’s petition for leave to file an amended pleading, asserting plaintiffs’ contributory negligence and assumption of the risk, is a final and appealable order. Under our current rules and case law, contributory negligence and assumption of the risk are affirmative defenses which are waived if not raised in new matter. Pa.R.Civ.P. 1030, 1082, Grota v. La Boccetta, 425 Pa. 620, 230 A.2d 206 (1967).

Furthermore, an immediate appeal must be sought. “[X]f review is postponed until final judgment in the case, the claimed right will be irreparably…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pugar v. GrecoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Fried v. FriedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Sweener v. First Baptist Church of EmporiumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Zarnecki v. ShepegiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API