Legal Opinion
Finn v. Carden
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 9, 1959No. 37712PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillian, Judge.
Count 1 of the petition, before it was amended, set forth a right of the plaintiff to recover the contract price of building the defendant’s house on the basis of quantum meruit. Since the count did not, in the form it was brought in, undertake to set out a suit on the contract, it was not necessary that a copy be incorporated therein or attached thereto as 'an exhibit. Ittner Bros. v. Farmers’ State Bank, 15 Ga. App. 235, 82 S. E. 909, holds: “A petition as upon an open account, with a copy of the alleged account attached, one item of which is, ‘To contract price of bank…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harden v. LangSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
- State Highway Department v. MacDougald Construction Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Southern Manufacturing Co. v. R. L. Moss Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
- Cannon v. HuntSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- MILLICAN ELECTRIC CO. INC. v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Biltmore Construction Co. v. Tri-State Electrical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Shaheen v. KikerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Williams v. CLAUSSEN-LAWRENCE CONSTRUCTION COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Daniel & Daniel, Inc. v. Stewart Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.