Legal Opinion

MILLICAN ELECTRIC CO. INC. v. Fisher

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1960No. 38232, 38263PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frankum, Judge.

1. A petition may be cast in two counts to afford the plaintiff the benefit of contradictory allegations of the same transaction and to prevent the defendant from defeating the ends of justice by obtaining a nonsuit where equally meritorious, though materially different, causes of action are proved. Miller v. Southern Ry. Co., 21 Ga. App. 367 (94 S. E. 619). A count based on an express contract may be joined with a count alleging facts to raise an implied promise to pay for services, i.e., quantum meruit, in one petition. Bra nnen v. Lanier, 97 Ga. App. 30 (102 S. E. 2d 96);…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kraft v. Rowland & RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. v. BlalockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Miller v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  4. Liverpool, London & Globe Insurance v. CreightonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  5. Lawrence v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sasser & Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Choate Construction Co. v. Ideal Electrical Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
  3. Stowers v. HallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Abrams v. Commercial Credit Plan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Goldstein v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API