Legal Opinion

Ronald E. Belding, Jr. v. Deeanna L. Demoulin

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2014No. 2012AP000829PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. Petitioner, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm), seeks review of a published court of appeals decision that reversed a summary judgment that had been granted in State Farm's favor. Although the circuit court agreed with State Farm that the drive-other-car exclusion precluded coverage, the court of appeals determined that Wis. Stat. § 632.32(6)(d) (2009-10), 2 which prohibited anti-stacking 3 clauses, barred the drive-other-car exclusion State Farm sought to apply.

¶ 2. State Farm argues that the drive-other-car exclusion is enforceable because it is specifically…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bartholomew v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund & Compcare Health Services InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Teschendorf v. State Farm Ins. CompaniesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Welch v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. KruseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Elliot Brey v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Kenneth C. Burgraff, Sr. v. Menard, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  3. The Segregated Account of Ambac Assurance Corporation v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Julie A. Augsburger v. Homestead Mutual Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Patti J. Roberts v. T.H.E. Insurance CompanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API