Legal Opinion
State v. Mehaffey
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 3, 2005No. 22652-2-IIIPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
105 P.3d 447 (2005)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Richard Murrel MEHAFFEY, Appellant.
No. 22652-2-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.
February 3, 2005.
William D. Edelblute, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
Kevin M. Korsmo, Andrew J. Metts, Attorneys at Law, Spokane, WA, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
This appeal follows Richard Mehaffey's conviction for possession of methamphetamine. He assigns error to the court's decision allowing the State to amend its information from possessing cocaine to possessing methamphetamine, after the statute of limitations on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. FordWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. RocheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Gary Daniel MeredithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019