Legal Opinion

Personal Restraint Petition Of Gary Daniel Meredith

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 5, 2019No. 46671-6Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

Filed Washington State Court of Appeals Division Two March 5, 2019 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON DIVISION II In re the Personal Restraint Petition of: No. 46671-6-II GARY DANIEL MEREDITH Petitioner. UNPUBLISHED OPINION MELNICK, J. — Gary Meredith filed this personal restraint petition (PRP) for relief from his convictions for rape of a child in the second degree and communicating with a minor for immoral purposes. Meredith asserts that his restraint is unlawful because (1) the trial court erroneously denied his for cause challenge of a juror, (2) the trial court…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Old Chief v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API