Representative Burling v. Chandler
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
Daniel Webster once said, “[T]he right to choose a representative is every man’s portion of sovereign power.” Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 30 (1849) (statement of counsel).
For the first time in the history of this State, the supreme court is required to scrutinize the process of apportioning the people’s right to vote in the election of representatives. That scrutiny has revealed significant anomalies, perpetuated for many years in the legislative redistricting process, which have undermined the principles of equality upon which the New Hampshire House of Representatives was founded.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re Legislative Districting of the StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- In re BelowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- Peterson v. BorstIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Linehan v. Rockingham County CommissionersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.