Legal Opinion

Representative Burling v. Chandler

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 26, 2002No. 2002-210PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Daniel Webster once said, “[T]he right to choose a representative is every man’s portion of sovereign power.” Luther v. Borden, 48 U.S. (7 How.) 1, 30 (1849) (statement of counsel).

For the first time in the history of this State, the supreme court is required to scrutinize the process of apportioning the people’s right to vote in the election of representatives. That scrutiny has revealed significant anomalies, perpetuated for many years in the legislative redistricting process, which have undermined the principles of equality upon which the New Hampshire House of Representatives was founded.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Gaffney v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Burns v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Legislative Districting of the StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. In re BelowSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Claremont School District v. GovernorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. Peterson v. BorstIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Linehan v. Rockingham County CommissionersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API