Thresher v. Astrue

MEMORANDUM***

Mary A. Thresher appeals the district court’s judgment which affirmed the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of Supplemental Security Income benefits. We reverse and remand.(1) Thresher argues that the Administrative Law Judge who heard her case erred in making a decision at step 3 of the five-step process that must be followed in deciding this matter. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.1520(a)(4)(iii). As relevant here, pursuant to that section, if the claimant has impairments listed in Appendix l,1 the claimant is disabled without further inquiry.2 Thresher argues that she meets the…