Legal Opinion
Blacktongue v. Berryhill
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided January 25, 2017No. Case No. C16-806-RSMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER ON SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Amor J. Blacktongue, brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. *1218§§ 405(g), and 1383(c)(3), seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying his applications for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI), under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. This matter has been fully briefed and, after reviewing the record in its entirety, the Court REVERSES the Commissioner’s decision and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Daughrity v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Farino v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2019
- Kelley v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Parton v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020
- Schmitz v. SaulDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2020