Legal Opinion

Mathews v. Colvin

District Court, E.D. California

Decided March 21, 2016No. 2:14-cv-1947-EFBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying his application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment are pending. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff’s motion is granted, the Commissioner is denied, and the matter is remanded for further proceedings.

I.BACKGROUND

Plaintiff filed an application for SSI, alleging that he had been disabled since January 1, 2004. Administrative…

2Cases cited18 opinions

Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

(SS) Kiser v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
Trisha A. Jackman v. Frank J. Bisignano, Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2026