Legal Opinion

Livingston v. City of Charlotte

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 1, 1984No. 8326SC711PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Judge.

By Assignments of Error Nos. 1-4 petitioners contend that the court erred in permitting respondents to file a motion to strike, in granting in principal part this motion, and in excluding evidence at trial relating to the stricken material. These assignments of error relate to allegations in the petition for judicial review that the Charlotte city officials “conspired, improperly and fraudulently, in tampering with the political and quasi-legislative process, in attempting to cause the Matthews Council to deny the petitioners a full and fair hearing” on a voluntary annexation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hines v. FrinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  2. Braswell v. PurserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Braswell v. PurserCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burnette v. City of GoldsboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API