Legal Opinion
City of Hampton v. Briscoe
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided February 24, 1993No. A92A2223, A92A2234PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Andrews, Judge.
We granted the City of Hampton’s application for leave to appeal the partial denial of its motion for summary judgment in plaintiff Briscoe’s action against it for inverse condemnation. The City of Hampton appealed in Case Nos. A92A2223 and A92A2234 is Briscoe’s cross-appeal.
The lawsuit arose from the following facts. Briscoe owns property in Hampton, Georgia. The property is located in a light manufacturing (M-l) zoning district. On August 18, 1989, Briscoe requested the issuance of a business license from the Hampton city clerk for a gen eral merchandise auction on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Harris v. Entertainment Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- WMM Properties, Inc. v. Cobb CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1986
- City of Summerville v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1949
- Barker v. County of ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- At&T Wireless PCS, Inc. v. Leafmore Forest Condominium Ass'n of OwnersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Simmons v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- Simmons v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997