Legal Opinion · Dissent

Simmons v. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1997No. A96A1743Published

1DissentAndrews, Chief Judge

Because I believe the superior court was correct in concluding, as argued by the Department of Transportation, that the use of Simmons’ property for a trucking business was a nonconforming usé under the zoning ordinance, thereby restricting his recovery for condemnation of a portion of that property to fair market value based upon residential/agricultural use, I must respectfully dissent.

The primary issue in a condemnation case is “[t]he fair market value of the property or interest taken or other evidence of just and adequate compensation.” OCGA § 32-3-16. The factors to be used in making…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Hayes v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  3. Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Board of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  4. City of Atlanta v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
  5. Jackson v. DelkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API