Simmons v. Department of Transportation
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1DissentAndrews, Chief Judge
Because I believe the superior court was correct in concluding, as argued by the Department of Transportation, that the use of Simmons’ property for a trucking business was a nonconforming usé under the zoning ordinance, thereby restricting his recovery for condemnation of a portion of that property to fair market value based upon residential/agricultural use, I must respectfully dissent.
The primary issue in a condemnation case is “[t]he fair market value of the property or interest taken or other evidence of just and adequate compensation.” OCGA § 32-3-16. The factors to be used in making…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Corey Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Board of Zoning AdjustmentSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
- Hayes v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Recycle & Recover, Inc. v. Georgia Board of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- City of Atlanta v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Jackson v. DelkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.