Legal Opinion

Colby v. Gunson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 17, 2009No. 06C157 A133979PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSercombe, J.

Plaintiff Colby is an attorney who represented himself in this proceeding for inspection of public records under the Oregon Public Records Law, ORS 192.410 to 192.505. Plaintiff prevailed in the appeal and seeks attorney fees and costs under ORS 192.490(3). We deny the petition for attorney fees and allow costs in the amount of $520.98, to abide by the outcome on remand under ORAP 13.05(4).

Plaintiff was successful in obtaining a remand of a decision denying him access to defendant medical examiner’s autopsy and laboratory test reports. We determined that the records were not exempt from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Kay v. EhrlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Hamer v. LentzIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Colby v. GunsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Colby v. GunsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  3. Stewart v. City of SalemCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API