Legal Opinion

Colby v. Gunson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2008No. 06C15785; A133979PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*668SERCOMBE, J.

This case concerns whether defendant, the state medical examiner, was obliged to supply plaintiff with a copy of the autopsy and laboratory tests report demanded under the Public Records Law, ORS 192.410 to 192.505. The trial court concluded that the record was exempt from public disclosure under ORS 192.502(9)(a), and entered a judgment dismissing plaintiffs complaint. After review of that judgment for errors of law, Withers v. State of Oregon, 133 Or App 377, 382, 891 P2d 675, rev den, 321 Or 284 (1995), we conclude that the record is not exempt from disclosure under ORS…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cabell v. City of Cottage GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Waddill v. Anchor Hocking, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Guard Publishing Co. v. Lane County School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Rogue Valley Sewer Services v. City of PhoenixOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Evertson v. City of KimballNebraska Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State ex rel. BH Media Group v. FrakesNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Colby v. GunsonOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  5. McDermott v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API