Legal Opinion

Edmonds v. Standcampiano

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 24, 2006No. 04-35449PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.

Rarely does a probate matter find its way into federal court. Here we are presented with a will contest involving a member of an Indian tribe in a Department of the Interior probate proceeding where we must decide whether state or federal law of evidence applies.

I

Matilda Covington, a Colville Indian,1 died on July 13, 1999. On July 9, 1999, shortly before her death, Covington executed a will leaving all her Indian trust allotments to her great-grandson, Brandon Austin Francis, a minor.2 Covington’s children predeceased her and she left no property to her three…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Opp Cotton Mills, Inc. v. Administrator of the Wage & Hour Division of the Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Golden West Refining Co. v. SunTrust BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  2. Golden West v. SuntrustCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. No. 04-35449Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API