Legal Opinion

Nutter v. Dougherty

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2007No. 5-9 EAP 2007PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice BAER.

We are called upon to consider whether the General Assembly, in enacting and later amending the Election Code,1 intended to preempt municipalities from legislating their own regulations limiting campaign contributions to candidates for *344municipal office.2 The General Assembly has enacted modest limitations on the manner in which interested individuals, political action committees (PAC), and corporations may contribute to the campaign coffers of candidates for state or local office, and no material limits on the sums that may permissibly be given to candidates. In an effort…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  4. Western Pennsylvania Restaurant Ass'n v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  5. City of Philadelphia v. SchweikerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. Spahn v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Hoffman Mining Co. v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Holt's Cigar Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Fross v. County of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API