Legal Opinion
State v. Raguseo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 23, 1993No. 14382PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendant, John Raguseo, appeals1 from the judgment of conviction, after a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a).2 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly: (1) denied his motions for a judgment of acquittal and for a new trial because the evidence did not establish that he had the intent to cause the death of the victim; (2) denied his motions for a judgment of acquittal and for a new trial because the evidence established the affirmative defense of extreme emotional disturbance; (3) instructed the jury regarding the affirmative defense of…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- State v. AshermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. PinnockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. CastonguaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. StanleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- State v. SivriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. CobbSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.