People v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Acosta, J.
The core issue on this appeal is whether defendant’s right to be present at all material stages of her trial was violated when the court held sidebar conferences with three potential jurors in defendant’s absence. We hold that defendant’s well-established right to be present (see People v Antommarchi, 80 NY2d 247 [1992]) was violated, and she is thus entitled to a new trial.
Defendant was charged with filing a false New York City Police Department complaint form and automobile theft affidavit alleging that her car had been stolen on February 10, 2005, when in fact…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People v. AntommarchiNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. RomanNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. PeoplesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. JoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017