Legal Opinion

Columbia Box Co. v. Saucier

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1914No. 4004PublishedCited by 7 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action by Etienne Saucier against the Columbia Box Company. Judgment for the plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

PIOOK, Circuit Judge.

Etienne Saucier, an employé of the Columbia Box Company in its factory at St. Louis, Mo., whose duty was to pick up and carry away the scraps, of wood which fell from the sawing tables, lost his balance on the slippery floor, and in an effort to regain himself his arm came in contact with a rapidly revolving circular saw and was severed. He sued the company for damages and recovered judgment. In his petition he counted specifically upon the failure of the company to comply with a statute of Missouri (section 7828, R. S. 1909) requiring that dangerous machinery “be safely…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. St. Louis Cordage Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Lore v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  3. Huss v. Heydt Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  4. Simpson v. Witte Iron Works Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  5. Durant v. Lexington Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1888

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ralph v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
  2. Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. HagenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  3. National Enameling & Stamping Co. v. ZirkovicsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
  4. Iowa Portland Cement Co. v. LamandolaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  5. Kokesch v. Excelsior Powder Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API