Atlas Portland Cement Co. v. Hagen
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Missouri; David P. Dyer, Judge. Action by Fred W. Hagen against the Atlas Portland Cement Company. There was a judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, the Atlas Portland Cement Company, is a corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania. It was the defendant below, and is hereafter so styled here. It has for years been engaged in conducting a cement manufacturing plant at Ilasco, Ralls county, Mo. The defendant in error, the plaintiff below, and so hereafter styled here, was employed by the defendant in what was known as clinker mill No. 1, a part of plant 5, under a foreman. This mill had in it a line shaft extending from east to west about 100 to 125 feet long. This was 9 inches in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Narramore v. Cleveland, C., C. & St. L. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- St. Louis Cordage Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
- Lore v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Motey v. Pickle Marble & Granite Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Huss v. Heydt Bakery Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- St. Louis Merchants' Bridge Terminal Ry. Co. v. SchuermanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- National Enameling & Stamping Co. v. ZirkovicsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1918
- United States ex rel. Pierce v. CargillDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1919
- United States ex rel. Pioneer Const. Co. v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
- Vance v. Google LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021