Legal Opinion

Ferguson v. Ferguson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2008No. S-12837PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Victoria Ferguson appeals the superior court's order denying her motion to modify the child support agreement she entered into with her former husband, James Ferguson. She argues that the lower court failed to make an adequate inquiry into the facts underlying her claim and that it mistakenly concluded that no change of cireumstances could justify a modification. Victoria also appeals the lower court's award of attorney's fees. Because the Fergusons' prior agreement contemplated Victoria's current ciream-stances, Victoria has already received the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Patch v. PatchAlaska Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Bunn v. HouseAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hopper v. HopperAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Flannery v. FlanneryAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Sawicki v. HaxbyAlaska Supreme Court · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Herring v. HerringAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Berry v. BerryAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Tomal v. AndersonAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Limeres v. LimeresAlaska Supreme Court · 2016

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API