Legal Opinion

Berry v. Berry

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 2012No. S-14008PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

A father appeals various procedural actions taken by the superior court in his divorce and custody proceeding. Appearing pro se, the father alleges that the court's expedited procedures violated his due process rights and reflected judicial bias. The father also argues that the court abused its discretion in its award of attorney's fees. Because the court's procedures did not violate the father's due process rights and the father has not shown that the court was biased against him, we affirm the procedural decisions of the superior court. But…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Matanuska Maid, Inc. v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Adkins v. CollensAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Downs v. DownsAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  4. Sarah A. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Sharon Thompson v. Everett ThompsonAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API