Legal Opinion

Tomal v. Anderson

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2018No. 7282 S-16720/S-16760PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINFREE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Alaska has long recognized unique legal standards for property disputes between two people ending a domestic partnership. Our case law has treated the end of a domestic partnership as coextensive with both the end of a marriage-like relationship and the end of the partners' cohabitation, as has generally been the case in the appeals we have decided. But this appeal presents the novel factual circumstance of a couple who continued living together after their marriage-like relationship ended. We must therefore clarify several aspects of our domestic partnership…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Capital Fin. Co. of Delaware Valley, Inc. v. AsterbadiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  4. Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Rosemarie P. v. Kelly B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Andrew B. v. Abbie B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
  3. Kristy McConville v. John J. OtnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Tong Vang v. Pa Kou XiongAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Gambini v. HamiltonAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API