Tomal v. Anderson
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WINFREE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Alaska has long recognized unique legal standards for property disputes between two people ending a domestic partnership. Our case law has treated the end of a domestic partnership as coextensive with both the end of a marriage-like relationship and the end of the partners' cohabitation, as has generally been the case in the appeals we have decided. But this appeal presents the novel factual circumstance of a couple who continued living together after their marriage-like relationship ended. We must therefore clarify several aspects of our domestic partnership…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Marvin v. MarvinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Cox v. CoxAlaska Supreme Court · 1994
- Capital Fin. Co. of Delaware Valley, Inc. v. AsterbadiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Kowalski v. KowalskiAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Doyle v. DoyleAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Rosemarie P. v. Kelly B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Andrew B. v. Abbie B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Kristy McConville v. John J. OtnessAlaska Supreme Court · 2021
- Tong Vang v. Pa Kou XiongAlaska Supreme Court · 2023
- Gambini v. HamiltonAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.