Legal Opinion

Hastie v. American Agri-Corp.

District Court, C.D. California

Decided October 31, 1991No. SACV 89-433-GLT, 90-164-GLT, 90-243-GLT and 91-236-GLTPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

TAYLOR, District Judge.

In the absence of published Ninth Circuit authority, the issue presented in this case is whether to apply retroactively the Supreme Court’s recent Lampf decision concerning the applicable statute of limitations for Securities Exchange Act of 1934 section 10(b) securities fraud cases. This court concludes that the Lampf rule is retroactive.

I. BACKGROUND

During the years 1982 to 1986 plaintiffs invested in a series of farming tax shelter arrangements promoted by defendant Am-cor. The Internal Revenue Service later disallowed all deductions on these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Welch III v. Cadre CapitalCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  5. Fleming Landfill, Inc. v. GarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. G.D. v. Westmoreland School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1992
  2. Greenwald v. MankoDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
  3. Cohen v. Prudential-Bache Securities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API