Legal Opinion · Dissent

Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. Kerr-McGee Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1974No. 73-1521Published

1DissentWilliam E. Doyle, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent, but at the same time I hasten to point out that I agree with all points of the opinion except with the part that denies Transwestern the right to condemn the leasehold interest of Kerr-McGee. 15 U.S.C. § 717f(h) authorizes the holder of a certificate of public convenience and necessity, here Transwestern, to exercise the right of eminent domain whenever appropriate. It says further that when he cannot by contract or otherwise agree with the owner of property “to the compensation to be paid for, the necessary right-of-way to construct, operate, and maintain a pipe line…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Autocar Sales & Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
  2. United States v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND, ETC.District Court, D. Maryland · 1944
  3. Cox v. RevelleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1915
  4. United States v. Fisk BuildingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1951
  5. 5655 Acres of Land & Coal in Indiana County v. Texas Eastern Transmission Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API