Legal Opinion

Cox v. Revelle

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 8, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Somerset County. (Pattisoh, O. J., and Staheoed, J.) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The Board of Shellfish Commissioners, acting under authority conferred by Chapter 711 of the Acts of 1906, leased to the appellant, on May 20, 1912, for the term of twenty years, a lot of ground in the bed of Manokin River, in Somerset County, to' be used for the purposes of oyster culture. It was the intent and policy of the law that natural oyster beds or bars should not be subject to lease for private use, but should be reserved as public ■ oyster fisheries for use in common by the people of the State nnder suitable regulation and license. The land demised to the appellant had originally…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Shoemaker v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Long Island Water Supply Co. v. BrooklynSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  4. New Orleans Water-Works Co. v. RiversSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  5. New Central Coal Co. v. George's Creek Coal & Iron Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1873

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bruce v. Dir., Chesapeake Bay Aff.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  2. Matthaei v. Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
  3. Prince George's County v. Collington Crossroads, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. State v. AmbroseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
  5. Radcliff v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API