Legal Opinion

United States v. CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND, ETC.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 9, 1944No. 2113PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

This federal condemnation case presents an extraordinary situation in both form and substance. The form of the petition of condemnation itself is not unprecedented in these recent war-time years, but the subject matter to which it relates is most unusual. To understand it, it is necessary to state the factual background from which the condemnation case has emerged. This is reflected in the answer of the property owner, the Pullman-Standard Car Manufacturing Company which objects to the right of the government to condemn the property under the special circumstances. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Ridgely v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  3. Davis v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1935
  4. In re Condemnation of Lands for Military CampDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1918
  5. United States v. 16.747 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in WilmingtonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Citizens Utilities Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Land Clearance for Redevelopment Corp. v. DoernhoeferSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  3. United States v. 70.39 Acres of LandDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  4. 11,000 Acres of Land v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  5. Sholom, Inc. v. State Roads CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API