Legal Opinion

Roge v. Kuhlman

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1962No. 420PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

136 So.2d 819 (1962)

Numa H. ROGE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Rex KUHLMAN et al., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 420.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit.

January 15, 1962.

Rehearing Denied February 7, 1962.

Certiorari Denied March 16, 1962.

Watson, Williams & Brittain, by Jack O. Brittain, Natchitoches, for plaintiff-appellant.

Gahagan & Gahagan, by Russell E. Gahagan, Natchitoches, for defendants-appellees.

Before TATE, SAVOY and HOOD, JJ.

TATE, Judge.

This is a possessory action. The plaintiff appeals from the dismissal of his suit. The issue essentially is whether the plaintiff correctly or with…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hill v. RicheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Hernandez v. HarsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. Loeblich v. GarnierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Rhodes v. CollierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1949
  5. Camus v. BienvenueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Succession of Cutrer v. CurtisLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  2. Belgarde v. City of NatchitochesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Owens v. SmithLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. General Acc. F. & L. Assur. Corp. v. Humble Oil & R. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Bihm v. HirschLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API