Legal Opinion

Federal Election Commission v. Public Citizen, Inc

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 10, 2001No. 99-14823PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

In this case, we consider a challenge to 2 U.S.C. § 441d(a)’s requirement that a communication expressly advocating the election or defeat of a clearly identified candidate disclose whether the communication was authorized by a candidate or candidate’s committee. The Second Circuit, which appears to be the only federal court of appeals to have addressed the constitutionality of § 441d(a), has upheld the candidate authorization disclosure as it applies to solicitations for contributions, but reserved the question of whether the candidate authorization disclosure could be required in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Kentucky Right To Life, Inc. v. TerryCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  4. Ranch House, Inc. v. AmersonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  5. West Virginians for Life, Inc. v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Brian Majors v. Marsha AbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Donna J. Beaulieu v. City of AlabasterCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Brian Majors v. Marsha AbellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Doe v. ReedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  5. National Federation of Republican Assemblies v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API