Legal Opinion

Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Pitco Frialator Co.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided June 21, 1988No. 87-1087PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCane, P.J.

Piteo Frialator Company appeals a denial of summary judgment. The trial court determined that Wisconsin’s Insurance Security Fund law, ch. 646, Stats., does not prohibit a subrogated insurance company from exercising its right of subrogation directly against an individual insured whose insurer has become insolvent. We conclude that, to the extent of the policy limits, no subrogation claim may lie against the individual insured. Because the damages did not exceed the policy limits in this case, we reverse and remand with directions to enter judgment in favor of Piteo.

The subrogated insurers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hedtcke v. Sentry InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
  2. E. L. White, Inc. v. City of Huntington BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  3. State v. DenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dugenske v. DugenskeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. American Standard Insurance v. ClevelandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Kontowicz v. American Standard Insurance Co. of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Witkowski v. BrownSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989
  3. Pennsylvania Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. Charter Abstract Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Reinsurance Ass'n of Minnesota v. Dunbar Kapple, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  5. Belongia v. Wisconsin Insurance Security FundCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API