Legal Opinion

State v. Doty

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 2, 2011No. CR0800647; A140903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of first-degree robbery, ORS 164.415; two counts of second-degree robbery, ORS 164.405; possession of a short-barreled shotgun, ORS 166.272; and being a felon in possession of a firearm, ORS 166.270. He argues on appeal that, because the indictment did not allege that defendant knew he was a felon, the trial court plainly erred in failing to grant, sua sponte, an arrest of judgment. As defendant conceded at oral argument, pursuant to this court’s recent decision in State v. Anderson, 233 Or App 475, 227 P3d 192 (2010), the indictment was sufficient. However, defendant…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MonroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. State v. DotyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API