Legal Opinion

Amino Brothers Company, Inc. v. The United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 17, 1967No. 158-62PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SKELTON, Judge *

In this case, the plaintiff sues to recover damages in the sum of $301,530 incident to two washouts of a low-water crossing and the delay of work resulting therefrom. It claims entitlement to such amount as an equitable adjustment under the “Suspension of Work” and “Changed Conditions” clauses of a contract which it executed with the United States Army Corps of Engineers for the construction of a flood control project, and as damages for an alleged breach of such contract. The defendant interposed the sovereign act doctrine, and the finality of findings of fact…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Horowitz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. United States v. Anthony Grace & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Jones v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1865
  5. Anthony P. Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Centex Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  3. J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Winstar Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  5. Everett Plywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API