Legal Opinion

Ledyard v. Phillips

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 1882PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Kent. Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Plaintiff in error brought assumpsit to recover the amount claimed to be due upon a promissory note given by defendants November 1st, 1872, and secured by chattel mortgage. Prior to July, 1873, the plaintiff held defendant’s bond for $1400, secured by mortgage upon their farm. On July 14,1873, the parties, in contemplation of an immediate foreclosure of the mortgage on the farm, entered into a written agreement concerning the disposition of the existing and future crops on the farm, a copy of which is given herewith.* On the day following the execution of *307this agreement proceedings were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ledyard v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. Midland Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Federal Land Bank of St. Paul v. Brown (In Re James)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
  3. Harvison v. GriffinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  4. National Life Ins. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
  5. Dayton v. Estate of DakinMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API