Legal Opinion

Dayton v. Estate of Dakin

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Ingham. (Person, J.) Appeal from the disallowance of a claim against the «state of a deceased person by commissioners on claims. Defendant brings error from a judgment of allowance in the circuit court. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

In August, 1888, the claimant owned a farm, which he had previously bought subject to a mortgage held by one Dakin, since deceased, and which was in August, 1888, in process of foreclosure in chancery, the sale being advertised for September 15. At this time, i. e., August, 1888, the claimant owned an undivided half of the crops upon the premises; the other half being owned by one Palmer, who put them in upon shares. The land was bought by Dakin upon the sale, and he thereafter sold Dayton’s share of the crop, including some corn which is claimed to have been cut and shocked before the sale.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Patrick v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Ledyard v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Edwards v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Branch v. LambertOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Taylor v. ThiemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Breitenwischer v. CloughMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Luizzi v. Brady's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Jackson v. Leech's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API