Legal Opinion

State v. Saxton

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2003No. 01-509PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

¶1 The State charged the Defendant, Shirley Saxton, in the District Court for the Nineteenth Judicial District in Lincoln County with criminal production of dangerous drugs, criminal possession of dangerous drugs, and possession of drug paraphernalia. Saxton filed motions to suppress evidence recovered during a warrantless search of her home and statements made by her to a police officer. The District Court denied those motions. Saxton pled guilty to one count of criminal production of dangerous drugs. She appeals the District Court’s orders denying her motions to suppress evidence. We affirm…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. United States v. Winston Bryant McConneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. State v. RushtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. SadowskiMontana Supreme Court · 1991

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. GomezMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. GittensMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. StoneMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. LaneganMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. Robert HoughtonMontana Supreme Court · 2010

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API