Legal Opinion
Cysewski v. Steingraber
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 28, 1946No. 34,151PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action to have a judgment against defendant Paul Steingraber adjudged a lien on certain of his real property in Ramsey county described as lots 6 and 7, block 3, Homer H. Hoyt’s Addition to St. Paul. He answered, asserting said premises were exempt as his homestead under Minn. St. 1941, § 510.02 (Mason St. 1927, § 8337).
The trial court found that said premises were exempt as his homestead and that the judgment, which was docketed on April 28, 1942, in said county, did) not constitute a lien thereon. From an order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial, this…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1865
- Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
- Clark v. DeweySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
- Thysell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- First National Bank of Mankato v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- O'BRIEN v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Vickery v. First Bank of LaCrosseCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Sisco v. PaulsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.