Legal Opinion
Stimson v. George Laycock, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided November 28, 2000No. A00A0953PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Presiding Judge.
This case arises out of a contract for the construction of a new home entered into by George Laycock, Inc. and Richard and Linda Stimson. The trial court granted summary judgment to Laycock, concluding that the Stimsons’ action was barred by the four-year statute of limitation expressed in OCGA § 9-3-30, that the Stimsons did not comply with the terms of a warranty provided by Laycock, and that the Stimsons were not entitled to bad faith attorney fees. We agree with the trial court that the record does not support an award of attorney fees, but we do not agree that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Daniel v. American Optical Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Benning Construction Co. v. Lakeshore Plaza Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Apac-Georgia, Inc. v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- Mitchell v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Williams Tile & Marble Co. v. Ra-Lin & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Western Pacific Mutual Insurance v. DaviesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Rice v. Lost Mountain Homeowners Assoc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
- Feinour v. Ricker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
- Gropper v. STO CORP.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Dryvit Systems, Inc. v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.