Groden v. N&D Transportation Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
In this appeal, we consider whether the Supreme Court’s decision . in Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349, 116 S.Ct. 862, 133 L.Ed.2d 817 (1996), requires dismissal of a pension fund’s lawsuit against an employer’s alleged alter egos. Specifically, we must decide, whether there is federal subject matter jurisdiction for the fund’s suit seeking $1.2 million in unpaid withdrawal liability that previously was assessed against the employer in a default judgment. The pension fund’s manager, appellant Edward F. Groden, maintains that subject matter jurisdiction exists under the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Burgos-Yantin v. Municipality of Juana DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
- OI European Group BV v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezuelaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
- (PC) Williams v. JustDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Bigda v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- CARPENTER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.