Legal Opinion

Groden v. N&D Transportation Co., Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 2, 2017No. 15-2553PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

In this appeal, we consider whether the Supreme Court’s decision . in Peacock v. Thomas, 516 U.S. 349, 116 S.Ct. 862, 133 L.Ed.2d 817 (1996), requires dismissal of a pension fund’s lawsuit against an employer’s alleged alter egos. Specifically, we must decide, whether there is federal subject matter jurisdiction for the fund’s suit seeking $1.2 million in unpaid withdrawal liability that previously was assessed against the employer in a default judgment. The pension fund’s manager, appellant Edward F. Groden, maintains that subject matter jurisdiction exists under the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Buck v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Peacock v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Management System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Burgos-Yantin v. Municipality of Juana DiazCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
  2. OI European Group BV v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezuelaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2023
  3. (PC) Williams v. JustDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. Bigda v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
  5. CARPENTER v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API