Legal Opinion
(PC) Williams v. Just
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 24, 2024No. 2:18-cv-00740Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Lance Williams, No. 2:18-cv-00740-KJM-DMC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. D. Just, 1S Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Lance Williams moves to attend the final pretrial conference for this case 18 | remotely via Zoom, for the court to appoint him counsel and to reopen discovery. Mot. at 1, ECF 19 | No. 128. Defendant D. Just opposes. Opp’n, ECF No. 129. The court denies the motion. 20 First, plaintiff moves to reopen discovery “because [the] discovery process was flawed” 21 | and if discovery is not reopened, his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Frederick C. Wilborn v. Antonio Escalderon and Ruth RushenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Timothy A. Brown v. Ronald Powell, Commissioner, New Hampshire Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.