Jackson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Justice.
I
Robert W. Jackson appeals the judgment of the Superior Court denying his Motion for Postconviction Relief following his 1993 conviction for the murder of Elizabeth Girardi. 1 Jackson argues that his conviction directly resulted from ineffective assistance of counsel and the State’s intentional violation of Brady v. Mary land 2 when it failed to tell his counsel about an agreement between the State and Andre Johnson, a key State’s witness. Jackson contends that this agreement implicitly granted Johnson future leniency for his testimony against Jackson. Because Jackson’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Capano v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- State v. ReyesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.