Legal Opinion

Starling v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided August 16, 2005No. 260 & 269, 2004PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELE, Chief Justice:

In October 2003, a Superior Court jury convicted Chauncey S. Starling of first-degree murder and other offenses. The same jury, after a post-trial penalty hearing, recommended that Starling be executed. The trial judge agreed and imposed a death sentence. Starling now appeals, alleging eight procedural and constitutional defects in the voir dire, trial, and penalty phases of the proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, we find that the trial judge acted within his discretion, and did not otherwise err, during jury selection, during the guilt phase, or while…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Starling v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. Revel v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  3. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
  5. State v. ReyesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API