Legal Opinion

City of Boise v. Industrial Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1997No. 22814PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an Industrial Commission (Commission) case regarding the City of Boise’s (City) application for worker’s compensation self-insurance. After a hearing, the Commission ruled that the City could not become self-insured under section 72-301 of the Idaho Code because it is a public employer. However, the Commission further ruled that even if the City could become self-insured, it had not met the requirements for doing so.

On appeal, the City contends that as a matter of statutory construction, a public employer can become self-insured. It also argues that the Commission’s…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Wolfe v. Farm Bureau InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Ogden v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Matter of WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State, Department of Health & Welfare Ex Rel. Lisby v. LisbyIdaho Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. EscobarIdaho Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Bradbury v. Idaho Judicial CouncilIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Aberdeen-Springfield Canal Co. v. PeiperIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Dominguez v. Evergreen Resources, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Eastern Idaho Agricultural Credit Ass'n v. NeibaurIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API