Legal Opinion

State v. Escobar

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 2000No. 25196PublishedCited by 160 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANSING, Judge.

Juan Escobar asks this Court to vacate his judgment of conviction for trafficking in methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732B. Escobar asserts that the district court erred in its interpretation of § 37-2732B with respect to the requisite proof of the quantity of drugs sold or delivered.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In a tape-recorded telephone conversation, Escobar represented to a confidential informant that he would sell to the informant one ounce, which equates to 28.35 grams, of methamphetamine. The following day, Escobar completed the transaction, but delivered only 24.266…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BurnightIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Grand Canyon Dories v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  4. City of Boise v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Davis v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by160 opinions

  1. State v. ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. State v. BeardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. RoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. James Patrick Stell, Jr.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. GillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API