State v. Escobar
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Judge.
Juan Escobar asks this Court to vacate his judgment of conviction for trafficking in methamphetamine, Idaho Code § 37-2732B. Escobar asserts that the district court erred in its interpretation of § 37-2732B with respect to the requisite proof of the quantity of drugs sold or delivered.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In a tape-recorded telephone conversation, Escobar represented to a confidential informant that he would sell to the informant one ounce, which equates to 28.35 grams, of methamphetamine. The following day, Escobar completed the transaction, but delivered only 24.266…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BurnightIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. Hagerman Water Right Owners, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Grand Canyon Dories v. Idaho State Tax CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
- City of Boise v. Industrial CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Davis v. Idaho Department of Health & WelfareIdaho Court of Appeals · 1997
3Cited by160 opinions
- State v. ReyesIdaho Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. BeardIdaho Court of Appeals · 2001
- State v. RoeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. James Patrick Stell, Jr.Idaho Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. GillIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010
155 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.