Legal Opinion

Clark v. Otis Elevator Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1995No. 1-93-2468PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

The defendant, Otis Elevator Company, appeals from a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiff, Michael Clark, on his complaint seeking recovery for negligence. The plaintiff cross-appeals from the trial judge’s order of a remittitur. We consider whether the trial judge erred when it found the plaintiff was incompetent to testify at trial because he had been adjudicated a disabled person under section 11a — 3 of the Probate Act of 1975 (755 ILCS 5/11a — 3 (West 1992)). For the following reasons, we reverse and remand for a new trial.

The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  2. People v. GarciaIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
  3. People v. VelascoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  4. People v. LamberskyIllinois Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Akers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  2. GREEN BY FRITZ v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. GREEN BY FRITZ v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  4. Green v. JacksonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Otis Elevator Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API