Akers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz
Plaintiff, Phillip Akers, appeals from a jury verdict finding defendant, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., not liable for plaintiff’s personal injuries. Plaintiff raises the following three issues on appeal: (1) whether an expert witness who was originally hired by plaintiff should have been barred from testifying for defendant at trial; (2) whether plaintiff was prejudiced when the jury learned that the expert was originally hired by plaintiff; and (3) whether defendant should have been required to pay plaintiff the fee plaintiff paid to the expert. For the following reasons, we…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
- Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
- Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Ogg v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Pharr v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Gausselin v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Chapman v. Hubbard Woods Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- Hopkinson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
- Midwesco-Paschen Joint Venture for Viking Projects v. Imo Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.