Legal Opinion

Akers v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 25, 1989No. 1-87-2316PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lorenz

Plaintiff, Phillip Akers, appeals from a jury verdict finding defendant, The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., not liable for plaintiff’s personal injuries. Plaintiff raises the following three issues on appeal: (1) whether an expert witness who was originally hired by plaintiff should have been barred from testifying for defendant at trial; (2) whether plaintiff was prejudiced when the jury learned that the expert was originally hired by plaintiff; and (3) whether defendant should have been required to pay plaintiff the fee plaintiff paid to the expert. For the following reasons, we…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Petrillo v. Syntex Laboratories, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  3. Consolidation Coal Co. v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Monier v. ChamberlainIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Ogg v. City of SpringfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pharr v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. Gausselin v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Chapman v. Hubbard Woods Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. Hopkinson v. Chicago Transit AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  5. Midwesco-Paschen Joint Venture for Viking Projects v. Imo Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API